ILLUSTRATIVE — SYNTHETIC PACKAGE NOT DERIVED FROM CUSTOMER DATA
REVIEW SUMMARY
2
MISSING
2
INCOMPLETE
2
MISMATCH
1
POTENTIAL NONCONFORMANCE
Seven findings raised against 29 characteristics and the supporting documentation.This review does not certify compliance, approve the FAIR, or replace the responsible quality organisation. Each finding cites the source it was raised from.
REVIEW COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS
Documents identified
6 of 7 expected
Characteristics evaluated
28 of 28
Characteristics linked to drawing balloons
28 of 28
Certificates referenced
3
Certificates located
1 of 3
Purchase order quality clauses supplied
No — clause-derived checks not performed
Approved processor status
Not verified — no approved-source list supplied
No findings in a category does not mean conformance in that category. Two checks could not be performed at all because their governing documents were not supplied.
FINDINGS
Likely rejection
Objectively verifiable, and named as a defect by more than one prime or consortium source.
Needs correction
A real defect, but severity depends on context not visible in the package.
Needs review
Something a reviewer should look at. Not a claim that it is wrong.
Unable to verify
The evidence required to judge it is missing or unreadable. Reported as a gap.
F-001 · CHARACTERISTIC 27MISMATCHLikely rejection
Bore diameter outside allowable tolerance
Requirement
Ø.375 ±.002 (limits 0.373 – 0.377)
Observed
0.3783, recorded on Form 3 field 9, tool CMM
Source
Drawing 117-4021 Rev F · Form 3 char 27
The recorded result exceeds the upper limit. Form 3 field 11 (Nonconformance Number) is blank and Form 1 field 19 records no documented nonconformance, so the condition is present in the data but not declared.
F-002MISMATCHNeeds review
Material temper on certificate differs from drawing requirement
Requirement
Note 2 — aluminium alloy 2024-T351 bar
Observed
Material certification 88-4471 states 2024-T3511
Source
Form 2 field 6 · material cert 88-4471
T351 and T3511 are different tempers. T3511 is stress-relieved by stretching with minor straightening permitted, and is specified for extrusions rather than plate or bar. The certificate does not evidence conformance to the requirement as written.
F-003 · CHARACTERISTIC 7MISSINGLikely rejection
Special process certificate referenced but not supplied
Requirement
Note 7 — anodize per MIL-A-8625F Type II Class 1
Observed
Form 3 char 7 cites certificate AN-2209; no such certificate is present in the package
Source
Form 2 field 10 · Form 3 char 7
A certificate referenced on the forms and absent from the package cannot be reconciled. The process is claimed as complete with no objective evidence supporting it.
F-004MISSINGLikely rejection
Certificate of Conformance absent
Requirement
Certificate of Conformance for the delivered lot
Observed
Form 2 field 10 is populated; no CofC document accompanies the package
Source
Package contents
Every buyer requirements document reviewed lists the Certificate of Conformance among mandatory package contents. Its absence is a completeness failure independent of the characteristic data.
F-005INCOMPLETENeeds correction
Special processor not identified on Form 2
Requirement
Form 2 field 8 (Supplier) — conditionally required
Observed
Blank for the anodize process on line 3
Source
Form 2 field 8
Where a special process is performed by an outside source, field 8 identifies the processor. Left blank, the processor cannot be checked against an approved-source list, which is the usual reason this field is examined.
F-006INCOMPLETELikely rejection
FAIR not signed by the reviewing authority
Requirement
Form 1 fields 22–23 — FAIR Reviewed/Approved By, and Date
Observed
Field 20 (Verified By) is signed and dated; fields 22 and 23 are blank
Source
Form 1 fields 22–23
Both fields are required. A FAIR verified but not reviewed has not completed the organisation's own acceptance step, and the package is not submittable in this state.
Attribute result recorded with no qualifying basis
Requirement
Note 9 — identification marking per MIL-STD-130
Observed
Form 3 field 9 records ACCEPT; field 10 (Designed/Qualified Tooling) is blank
Source
Form 3 char 9, fields 9–10
An attribute result is acceptable where a qualifying basis is named — go/no-go tooling, linked automated inspection output, a test certificate carrying specific values, or visual rating against standard photographs. None is recorded here, and no photograph of the part marking accompanies the package. Requires quality engineer disposition rather than automatic rejection.